欢迎访问教学吧范文网,资源免费下载哦!

GRE作文分数重要吗

天下 分享 时间: 加入收藏 我要投稿 下载本文

GRE作文成绩虽然不计入GRE考试总分,但对于想要申请文科类研究生专业的考生来说其价值并不容忽视,许多排名靠前的文科类院校和专业都会对GRE写作成绩提出单独要求。下面小编就和大家分享GRE作文分数重要吗,来欣赏一下吧。

GRE作文分数重要吗?

许多人可能都觉得,作文独立计分不算入总分,可能其分数重要性并不是太高。这种想法其实是存在很大错误的,原因主要有两点:

1. 文科专业重视GRE作文分数

众所周知,GRE考试作为一门研究生阶段入学的综合能力测试,其考试成绩可以用来申请全美各大学校的大部分研究生专业和项目。理科项目一般不需要作文得分,更看重的是GRE总分和GRE数学部分的成绩。而文科项目除了总分和语文部分成绩外,对于作文也往往会提出专门的分数要求,在这一点上越是优秀的学校越是明显。而假如考生想要申请的是排名靠前,在TOP20以内的顶尖文科名校,那么GRE作文至少也需要考出4分以上的成绩才能过关。根据官方发布的最新数据显示,2016年中国考生的GRE作文平均成绩仅为3分,因此大家想要获得优秀文科院校的青睐,就需要在作文方面获得超过大部分考生的平均水准的成绩。

2. 作文分数常用于初期筛选申请人

同时,由于目前许多顶级名校的申请人数过多,招生官在初步筛选申请者时,往往会采取先根据GRE得分一刀切的方式,把一定分数线以下的考生直接排除。而在剩下的考生中,哪怕你的GRE总分超过别人不少,但如果作文分数偏低,那么你的被录取可能性就会降低。可以说,在GRE总分处于同一水平的情况下,考生GRE作文得分高低将成为衡量考生水平的重要参考指标。

GRE写作提分从这些角度入手

因此,GRE考生如果申请的是文科类院校专业,那么作文成绩就必须要进行提升,而提分的具体侧重要点可以归纳为以下四个方面:

1. 整体结构

文章的整体结构框架是一篇作文好坏的最重要标准。一般来说,一篇标准的GRE高分作文,按照开头,结尾加上中间三个段落的五段式写法是比较常见的。因此,考生对于一篇文章的写作,至少要列出3个分论点,确保中间三段言之有物,同时开头结尾也需要发挥出各自相应的引导和总结作用。

2. 逻辑论证

GRE作文有两篇,而无论是立论文ISSUE还是驳论文ARGUMENT,其本质都属于议论文,因此让文章显得有说服力就成为了关键所在。无论是让自己的论点能够站得住脚,还是让对方的观点显得错误百出,都需要考生通过逻辑论证来得以实现。因此,逻辑论证的合理性、对观点挖掘的深度,以及分论点之间的的连贯性,都考生需要在写作中体现出来以支撑逻辑论证。

3. 遣词造句

一篇好作文自然离不开词句上的运用。合理正确没有语法错误只能算是达标,想要让GRE作文得到4分以上的评价,考生就需要在达标以上进一步进行遣词造句的优化运用。句式使用上需要多样化,避免简单句的连续出现,但也不能过度堆砌长难句而让文章显得累赘。词汇运用上不能重复使用相同词汇,要体现出一定的变化展现词汇量,但也要确保所用词汇的正确表达,不能为了追求新颖而滥用生僻词汇,也需要避免词汇间错误搭配的问题。

4. 字数篇幅

虽然GRE考试对于作文字数篇幅从来没有提出过明确要求,但根据官方公布的各类高分范文来看,一般来说字数在400-600字是最佳范围。这是因为篇幅过短的文章,容易给考官留下考生写作能力不足,无法表达出自己想法的印象,但篇幅太长同样会给人留下啰嗦累赘的感觉。因此把文章的篇幅字数控制在400-600字是最为合适的做法。

综上所述,哪怕是GRE作文成绩不计入总分,大家也不能对作文备考掉以轻心。特别是对于想要申请文科的考生来说,足够优秀的作文成绩才能帮你在达成申请目标成功拿到OFFER的道路上走得更远。

GRE写作高分范文:竞争利弊问题

题目:

"Competition is ultimately more beneficial than detrimental to society."

归根结底,竞争对于社会是利多弊少。

正文:

Darwin suggested that the process of evolution is one based on competition. This deadly competition weeds out the weak and only the fittest of the species survives. Humans, being the product of millions of years of evolution, are by nature, competitive beings. Yet, humans are also social beings. Like the bees in the hive, we are not very successful living completely on our own. We need to cooperate with other individuals for our survival. Thus, a conflict ensues, between our innate competitiveness, and our need to cooperate. There are pros and cons associated with both. However, it is my belief that overall, competition, is more detrimental than beneficial to human society.

First, let us try to identify why there is competition in the first place. In an environment abundant with resources, where supply outstrips demand, there is very little need for the inhabitants to fight with each other over them. This is not the case on planet earth. Resources are limited, and there is constant jostling to get to the front of the queue to get acquire them. For example, thousands of prospective students apply to gain entrance to top universities around the world, but there are only a handful of places in those

universities. Thus, there is competition to get into to these hallowed institutions of higher learning.From a utilitarian perspective, competition is a good thing. In evolution it is responsible for the elimination of "weak" genes. In the business environment, it gets rid of the weaker players. In politics, it weeds out unpopular candidates. In academia, it gets rid of weak students.

Furthermore, competition leads to self improvement. Businesses will strive to offer better products and services at lesser prices. The consumer reaps rich rewards from this competitive spirit. Politicians strive to do the utmost for the people, so they would get reelected. Students excel in there studies, trying to outdo each other.

Thus, ostensibly, competition is responsible for the betterment of the society as a whole. However, this is just the superficial view. Underneath the surface, competition, in every aspect, is slowly eating away at the very fabric of the society.

While it is true to say that competition in corporate world has brought great benefits to the consumer, the society as "Missed A here"whole is playing a great price for it. Most businesses are exploiting cheap labour in the third world to maximise their profits. There are thousands of sweatshops run by well known western corporations in countries like Indonesia, Bangladesh and China. People are forced to work in squalid conditions, often 16 hours a day. They are lucky to receive a dollar a day for there labours. The moment a government in any of these countries try to improve the working conditions of the employees, these multinational giants flee the country, often leaving whole communities facing financial ruin. The corporations are aware that there are plenty of other labour markets that could be exploited with gay abandon.

That is just the human cost. What about the environmental costs? Competition has forced many corporations to "stream line" their operations. Environmental standards are normally the first victims of this "stream line" process. A significant amount of environmental pollution and land degradation has been blamed on industry, yet the factories keep producing more and more. Thousands of items go unsold each year due to competition. Only a fraction of this merchandise is recycled. The rest goes to the already overflowing landfills.

GRE写作高分范文:多媒体教育

GRE写作题目:

Although innovations such as video,computers,and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students,these technologies all too often distract from real learning.

尽管诸如电视、电脑和互联网这样的发明似乎给学校教育提供了进步的手段,但是所有这些技术往往也是在偏离真正的学习。

GRE写作范文:

Nowadays there is a growing concern about the role that innovations have played in the field of learning. While most people think that innovations benefit learning process in various ways,different opinions arise that these technology advancements actually distract students from real learning. On balance,according to my personal observation,whether innovations can be beneficial or detrimental to real learning depends on the students and the teachers,not on these innovations themselves.

To begin with,technological innovations do help teaching and learning in various ways.With the aid of these technologies,the process of teaching and learning can be shorter and easier than before. For instance,if a student want certain published papers of an academic discipline,he/she may look through considerable catalogs to find the ones he/she needs. However,with the help of Internet innovation,at present most of these papers are published online. Consequently,to find certain paper the procedure is much easier and shorter, the students just type the key words and other information of the paper,and then the system will search the database,and the papers are there waiting for them. As this new approach can save a lot of time for the students,he/she could have more time reading the papers and absorbing the knowledge rather than checking and looking for the papers that could be a waste of his/her time. This example aptly illustrates how technology advancement benefited the students and their learning process.

Secondly,while innovations can help learning in various ways,it is more important that the central role of the pursuit for knowledge and wisdoms are maintained. What real matters is not the approach but the purpose of learning. In India,where modern technologies are less applied to the learning process than in the US and other developed countries,still a lot of distinguished students achieved their academic goal with their hard work and desires to knowledge. In the US,where the software engineering students are given the most advanced facilities and apparatus for their learning and research,however,it is wildly accepted that they are far less outstanding compared to the Indian students of software,who may share computers in groups. From this comparison we can see that the real and core push of learning is the desire for knowledge,not the help of innovations.

In addition,if not guided properly,the technology advancement might inhibit learning.In other words,innovation can distract the students from real learning than helping them. It is obvious that a computer can help students of science to calculate mathematical equations but can also be used for recreation such as net surfing or computer games. It is highly possible that these students can spend more time and energy on recreations rather than learning when using a computer. Thus,learning is inhibited. Under this circumstance,guidance and restrictions are needed to ensure the right use of innovations for learning,or the consequence may be on the contrary to the students and teachers' desire.


GRE作文相关文章:

★ GRE写作:高分冲刺

★ GRE写作:写作论据的技巧

★ 学习资料库

★ GRE词汇如果高效的背诵记忆

★ 组织主题夏令营活动策划方案2020

★ 夏令营实践主题活动策划方案范文

★ 夏令营特色活动策划方案

★ 《心理学与生活》读书笔记范文

★ 高三英语单词汇总

★ 中国合伙人观后感作文



221381
领取福利

微信扫码领取福利

微信扫码分享